Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
161 km/h
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4275
4341 mm
1765
1804 mm
1535
1693 mm
2570
2676 mm
240
414 L
/
16
Fuel Economy
15.4
17.2 Km/L
48
50 L
/
17.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
Driver Seat
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
Front Driver And Passenger Airbags.Passenger Airbag With Disconnecting Function.
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
1.6 L - 2.0 L
145 BHP - 148 BHP
105 BHP - 135 BHP
6 Speed SkyActiv with Sports Mode & Automatic
Automatic & CVT & Manual
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
148 BHP
115 BHP
192
156 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025
- Number of Airbags
- Spare Wheel
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) if you care more about power; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025 if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) has a fuel consumption of 6.49, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025 has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025 is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2570, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025 has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025 uses Front Wheel Drive.