Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) vs EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
/
4
N/A, Electric
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4275
5209
1765
2010
1535
1731
2570
3110
240
/
Fuel Economy
15.4
/
48
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
Key Spec
2.0 L
/
145 BHP - 148 BHP
429 BHP - 543 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
5 Seater
6 - 7 Seater
/
TBD
/
320 km
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
0.0 L
Gasoline
Electric
148 BHP
429 BHP
192
600
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Door Edge Protector
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) if you care more about price; choose EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) has a fuel consumption of 6.49, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2570, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters has a wheelbase of 3110. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters uses All Wheel Drive.