Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) vs Exeed RX 2024 Exeed RX 2024 2.0T Comfort (FWD) Comparison
Car Information
SUV
/
8.3
/
Engine / Motor
190
/
4
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4275
4.775
1765
1.920
1535
1.671
2570
2.800
240
400
/
✓
Fuel Economy
15.4
/
48
65
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
/
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2000 L
2.0 L
145 BHP - 148 BHP
261 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Petrol
148 BHP
261 BHP
192
400
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Exeed RX 2024 Exeed RX 2024 2.0T Comfort (FWD)
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- 360 Degree Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Front Crumple Zone
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Speed Limiter
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickExeed RX 2024 Exeed RX 2024 2.0T Comfort (FWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) if you care more about interior space; choose Exeed RX 2024 Exeed RX 2024 2.0T Comfort (FWD) if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) has a fuel consumption of 6.49, while Exeed RX 2024 Exeed RX 2024 2.0T Comfort (FWD) has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2570, while Exeed RX 2024 Exeed RX 2024 2.0T Comfort (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2.800. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive, while Exeed RX 2024 Exeed RX 2024 2.0T Comfort (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive.