Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) vs GMC Acadia 2023 3.6L AT4 (AWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
210
4
6
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4275
4917
1765
1915
1535
1676
2570
2858
240
362
Fuel Economy
15.4
11.4
48
72
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2000 L
3.6 L
147 BHP - 148 BHP
288 BHP - 310 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
7 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
3.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
148 BHP
310 BHP
192
366
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
GMC Acadia 2023 3.6L AT4 (AWD)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Blind Spot Warning
- Auto Door Lock
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickGMC Acadia 2023 3.6L AT4 (AWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) if you care more about fuel economy; choose GMC Acadia 2023 3.6L AT4 (AWD) if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) has a fuel consumption of 6.49, while GMC Acadia 2023 3.6L AT4 (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 8.77. Therefore, Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2570, while GMC Acadia 2023 3.6L AT4 (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2858. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, GMC Acadia 2023 3.6L AT4 (AWD) , offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive, while GMC Acadia 2023 3.6L AT4 (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.