Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) vs GMC Yukon 2023 5.3 V8 AT4 (AWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
/
4
8
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4275
5334
1765
2057
1535
1943
2570
3071
240
/
Fuel Economy
15.4
/
48
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2000 L
5.3 L - 5300 L
110 BHP - 148 BHP
355 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
7 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
5.3 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
148 BHP
355 BHP
192
520
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
GMC Yukon 2023 5.3 V8 AT4 (AWD)
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Spacious interior space
- Excellent towing capabilities
- Advanced entertainment systems
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Their price is relatively high
- Its large size may be inappropriate for some areas
Related comparisons
Editor's PickGMC Yukon 2023 5.3 V8 AT4 (AWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) if you care more about overall equipment; choose GMC Yukon 2023 5.3 V8 AT4 (AWD) if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) has a fuel consumption of 6.49, while GMC Yukon 2023 5.3 V8 AT4 (AWD) has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2570, while GMC Yukon 2023 5.3 V8 AT4 (AWD) has a wheelbase of 3071. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, GMC Yukon 2023 5.3 V8 AT4 (AWD) , offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive, while GMC Yukon 2023 5.3 V8 AT4 (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.