Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) vs MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
170
4
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4275
4.314
1765
1.809
1535
1.624
2570
2.585
240
448
/
✓
Fuel Economy
15.4
17.2
48
48
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
1.3 L - 1.5 L
145 BHP - 148 BHP
112 BHP - 168
6 Speed SkyActiv with Sports Mode & Automatic
6AT & Automatic & CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Engine
2.0 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Petrol
148 BHP
112 BHP
192
150
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMG ZS 2020 1.5L STD
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) if you care more about interior space; choose MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) has a fuel consumption of 6.49, while MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2570, while MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD has a wheelbase of 2.585. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive, while MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD uses Front Wheel Drive.