Mazda CX-30 2024 2.0L Core 2WD vs Tahoe LT Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
192
180 km/h
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4395
5181
1795
2053
1562
1925
2655
3071
430
3479
/
18
/
5 Doors
Fuel Economy
16.7
9.7
48
100
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
10.2
/
Gideon/Dark Atmosphere premium cloth
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
frontal airbags for driver and front outboard passenger; seat-mounted side-impact airbags for driver and front outboard passenger; driver inboard seat-mounted side-impact airbag; headcurtain airbags for all rows in outboard seating positions3,4
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
10AT
/
AT
/
10
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
Front Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
5.3 L - 6.2 L
153 HP - 155 BHP
320 BHP - 420 BHP
6 Sp SkyActiv with Sports Mode & Automatic
10 Speed AT & 10AT & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Petrol & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
7 Seater - 9 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
5.3 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
155 BHP
355 BHP
200
518
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda CX-30 2024 2.0L Core 2WD
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear AC Controls
- Electric Curtain - Rear
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Seats - Comfort
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Runflat Tyres
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Door Reflectors
- Electric anti-dazzling room mirror
- Tire Repair Kit
- Security System
- Pedestrian airbag
- First Aid Kit
- Fire Extinguisher
- Door Edge Protector
- Crosswind Assist
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Active Bonnet
- Acceleration Skid Control
- Collision Detection
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Speed Limiter
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
Tahoe LT
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Remote key types
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Collision Detection
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda CX-30 2024 2.0L Core 2WD if you care more about fuel economy; choose Tahoe LT if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda CX-30 2024 2.0L Core 2WD has a fuel consumption of 5.99, while Tahoe LT has a fuel consumption of 10.31. Therefore, Mazda CX-30 2024 2.0L Core 2WD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda CX-30 2024 2.0L Core 2WD has a wheelbase of 2655, while Tahoe LT has a wheelbase of 3071. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Tahoe LT, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda CX-30 2024 2.0L Core 2WD uses Front Wheel Drive, while Tahoe LT uses Four-Wheel Drive.