Mazda CX-5 2024 2.5L Full Option (AWD) vs Ford Expedition 2024 3.5L EcoBoost XL Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200
185
4
N/A
Dimensions
5 Seater
8 Seater
4550
5.233
1840
2.024
1675
1.960
2700
3.022
506
528
/
✓
Fuel Economy
14.3
9.1
58
106
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
1.9 L - 2.5 L
3.5 L - 5.4 L
151 BHP - 188 BHP
300 BHP - 440
6 Sp Skyactiv with Sports Mode & 6 Speed Skyactiv with Sports+Offroad Mode & Automatic
10-Speed Selectshift Automatic & 10-Speed SelectshifteAutomatic & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
6 Seater - 8
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
3.5 L
Gasoline
Petrol
188 BHP
385 BHP
251
629
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda CX-5 2024 2.5L Full Option (AWD)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Crash Auto Door Unlock
- Auto Door Lock
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
Ford Expedition 2024 3.5L EcoBoost XL
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- 360 Degree Camera
- Rear Defogger
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Rollover stability control
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Active Bonnet
- Collision Detection
- Speed Limiter
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Spacious interior space
- Excellent towing ability
- Comfort and ride quality
Negative
- Fuel consumption is high
- Large size may cause difficulty in maneuvering
- The initial purchase price is high
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda CX-5 2024 2.5L Full Option (AWD) if you care more about fuel economy; choose Ford Expedition 2024 3.5L EcoBoost XL if you care more about power.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda CX-5 2024 2.5L Full Option (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 6.99, while Ford Expedition 2024 3.5L EcoBoost XL has a fuel consumption of 10.99. Therefore, Mazda CX-5 2024 2.5L Full Option (AWD) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda CX-5 2024 2.5L Full Option (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2700, while Ford Expedition 2024 3.5L EcoBoost XL has a wheelbase of 3.022. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mazda CX-5 2024 2.5L Full Option (AWD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda CX-5 2024 2.5L Full Option (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive, while Ford Expedition 2024 3.5L EcoBoost XL uses All Wheel Drive.