Mazda CX-5 2024 2.5L GS (FWD) vs G318 Standard Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210
/
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4550
5010
1840
1985
1670
1895
2700
2880
965
/
Fuel Economy
14.7
16.3
58
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
DHT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
/
Key Spec
1.9 L - 2.5 L
1.5
151 BHP - 188 BHP
252 BHP
6 Sp Skyactiv with Sports Mode & 6 Speed Skyactiv with Sports+Offroad Mode & Automatic
DHT
Gasoline & Petrol
Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.5 L
1.5
Gasoline
Hybrid
188 BHP
252 BHP
251
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda CX-5 2024 2.5L GS (FWD)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Spare Wheel
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
G318 Standard
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickG318 Standard
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda CX-5 2024 2.5L GS (FWD) if you care more about overall equipment; choose G318 Standard if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda CX-5 2024 2.5L GS (FWD) has a fuel consumption of 6.8, while G318 Standard has a fuel consumption of 6.13. Therefore, G318 Standard is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda CX-5 2024 2.5L GS (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2700, while G318 Standard has a wheelbase of 2880. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, G318 Standard, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda CX-5 2024 2.5L GS (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive, while G318 Standard uses No data.