Mazda CX-60 2024 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD vs Changan CS35 2017 1.6L Comfortable Comparison
Car Information
SUV
/
6.8
/
Engine / Motor
6
4
/
180
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4745
4160
1890
1810
1687
1670
2870
2560
/
348
Fuel Economy
13.5
14.7
58
52
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Key Spec
3.3 L
1.6 L
280 BHP
123 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
3.3 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
280 BHP
123 BHP
450
160
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda CX-60 2024 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Security System
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Speed Limiter
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
Changan CS35 2017 1.6L Comfortable
- Rear Defogger
- Keyless Entry
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickChangan CS35 2017 1.6L Comfortable
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda CX-60 2024 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD if you care more about interior space; choose Changan CS35 2017 1.6L Comfortable if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda CX-60 2024 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD has a fuel consumption of 7.41, while Changan CS35 2017 1.6L Comfortable has a fuel consumption of 6.8. Therefore, Changan CS35 2017 1.6L Comfortable is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda CX-60 2024 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD has a wheelbase of 2870, while Changan CS35 2017 1.6L Comfortable has a wheelbase of 2560. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mazda CX-60 2024 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda CX-60 2024 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD uses All Wheel Drive, while Changan CS35 2017 1.6L Comfortable uses Front Wheel Drive.