Mazda CX-60 2024 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD vs EV9 2WD SHORT RANGE (Air) Comparison

Car Information

6.8

8.2

/

443

/

76.1

Engine / Motor

6

N/A, Electric

/

190

Dimensions

5 Seater

7

4745

5009

1890

1979

1687

1750

2870

3099

/

572

Fuel Economy

13.5

/

58

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

Transmission

/

Automatic

E-SHIFT (SBW)

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Rear Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

/

/

Key Spec

3.3 L

/

280 BHP

201 BHP - 380

Automatic

Automatic & Automatic & E-SHIFT (SBW)

Gasoline & Petrol

Electric

TBD

/

5 Seater

6 - 7

/

TBD

/

TBD

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

3.3 L

SINGLE

Gasoline

Electric

280 BHP

215 BHP

450

350

/

SINGLE

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Mazda CX-60 2024 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Push Button Start
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
    • Security System
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Speed Limiter
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Spare Wheel
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning
  • EV9 2WD SHORT RANGE (Air)

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Lane Departure Warning

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickMazda CX-60 2024 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Mazda CX-60 2024 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD if you care more about price; choose EV9 2WD SHORT RANGE (Air) if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mazda | Mazda CX-60 2024 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD

VS

Omoda | C5 TECH 1.5L

Mazda | Mazda CX-60 2024 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD

VS

SERES | 5 2WD Standard

Mazda | Mazda CX-60 2024 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD

VS

SERES | 5 4WD Premium

Mazda | Mazda CX-60 2024 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD

VS

Exeed | TXL Comfort 1.6T

Mazda | Mazda CX-60 2024 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD

VS

Exeed | LX Flagship 1.6T

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Mazda CX-60 2024 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD has a fuel consumption of 7.41, while EV9 2WD SHORT RANGE (Air) has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Mazda CX-60 2024 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD has a wheelbase of 2870, while EV9 2WD SHORT RANGE (Air) has a wheelbase of 3099. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EV9 2WD SHORT RANGE (Air), offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda CX-60 2024 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD uses All Wheel Drive, while EV9 2WD SHORT RANGE (Air) uses Rear Wheel Drive.