Mazda CX-60 2024 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD vs MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
6
4
/
170
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4745
4.314
1890
1.809
1687
1.624
2870
2.585
/
✓
/
448
Fuel Economy
13.5
17.2
58
48
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Key Spec
3.3 L - 3.3 L
1.3 L - 1.5 L
280 HP - 284 BHP
112 BHP - 168
8 SPEED SKYACTIV® WITH Mi-DRIVE & 8-speed Automatic
6AT & Automatic & CVT
Gasoline & Hybrid
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 7 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
3.3 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Petrol
280 BHP
112 BHP
450
150
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda CX-60 2024 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Security System
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Speed Limiter
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda CX-60 2024 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD if you care more about interior space; choose MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda CX-60 2024 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD has a fuel consumption of 7.41, while MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda CX-60 2024 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD has a wheelbase of 2870, while MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD has a wheelbase of 2.585. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mazda CX-60 2024 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda CX-60 2024 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD uses All Wheel Drive, while MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD uses Front Wheel Drive.