Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 1 (AWD) vs 300 Conqueror 2.0T HEV Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
200 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
5075
4760 mm
1969
1930 mm
1716
1927 mm
2930
2750 mm
/
5 Doors
/
400 L
/
224 m
Fuel Economy
74
75 L
/
15 Km/L
/
15 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
All Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Key Spec
2.5 L - 3.7 L
2.0 L
226 BHP - 273 BHP
342 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Hybrid
TBD
TBD
7 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Hybrid
226 BHP
342 BHP
420
648 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 1 (AWD)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- 360 Degree camera
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Door Reflectors
- Tire Repair Kit
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Active Bonnet
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
300 Conqueror 2.0T HEV
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 1 (AWD) if you care more about interior space; choose 300 Conqueror 2.0T HEV if you care more about power.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 1 (AWD) has a fuel consumption of No data, while 300 Conqueror 2.0T HEV has a fuel consumption of 6.67. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 1 (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2930, while 300 Conqueror 2.0T HEV has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 1 (AWD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 1 (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive, while 300 Conqueror 2.0T HEV uses Four Wheel Drive.