Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 1 (AWD) vs Jeep Wrangler 2018 Rubicon X 3.6L A/T Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

/

157

/

6

Dimensions

7 Seater

4 Seater

5075

4223

1969

1873

1716

1865

2930

2268

/

360

Fuel Economy

74

70

/

8.8

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

/

Automatic

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

/

All Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

/

/

/

Key Spec

2.5 L - 2500 L

2.0 L - 3605 L

226 BHP - 273 BHP

270 BHP - 285 BHP

Automatic

Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

7 Seater

4 Seater - 5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.5 L

3.6 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

226 BHP

285 BHP

420

347

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 1 (AWD)

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Door Reflectors
    • Tire Repair Kit
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Active Bonnet
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Spare Wheel
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning
  • Jeep Wrangler 2018 Rubicon X 3.6L A/T

    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Seats - Comfort
    • Rollover stability control

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickJeep Wrangler 2018 Rubicon X 3.6L A/T

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 1 (AWD) if you care more about interior space; choose Jeep Wrangler 2018 Rubicon X 3.6L A/T if you care more about power.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mazda | Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 1 (AWD)

VS

Mazda | Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 1 (AWD)

Mazda | Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 1 (AWD)

VS

Tank | 300 Conqueror 2.0T HEV

Mazda | Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 1 (AWD)

VS

Tank | Tank 300 Conqueror HEV

Mazda | Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 1 (AWD)

VS

Porsche | Porsche Cayenne Coupe 2020 Base

Mazda | Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 1 (AWD)

VS

Kia | Kia Sportage 2024 1.6T (FWD) Topline

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 1 (AWD) has a fuel consumption of No data, while Jeep Wrangler 2018 Rubicon X 3.6L A/T has a fuel consumption of 11.36. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 1 (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2930, while Jeep Wrangler 2018 Rubicon X 3.6L A/T has a wheelbase of 2268. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 1 (AWD), offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 1 (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive, while Jeep Wrangler 2018 Rubicon X 3.6L A/T uses All Wheel Drive.