Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) vs Avatr 11 2024 Avatr 11 2024 AWD Comparison
Car Information
SUV
/
8.3
4.5
Engine / Motor
210
200
4
N/A, Electric
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
5075
4.880
1969
1.970
1716
1.601
2930
2.975
407
489
Fuel Economy
11.9
/
74
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
680
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
/
✓
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Key Spec
2.5 L - 3.7 L
/
226 BHP - 273 BHP
570 BHP
Automatic
TBD
Gasoline & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
7 Seater
5 Seater
/
TBD
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
0.0 L
Gasoline
Electric
226 BHP
570 BHP
420
650
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Motor
/
Double
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Runflat Tyres
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Active Bonnet
- Collision Detection
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Avatr 11 2024 Avatr 11 2024 AWD
- 360 Degree Camera
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickAvatr 11 2024 Avatr 11 2024 AWD
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) if you care more about interior space; choose Avatr 11 2024 Avatr 11 2024 AWD if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) has a fuel consumption of 8.4, while Avatr 11 2024 Avatr 11 2024 AWD has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2930, while Avatr 11 2024 Avatr 11 2024 AWD has a wheelbase of 2.975. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) , offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive, while Avatr 11 2024 Avatr 11 2024 AWD uses All Wheel Drive.