Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) vs CS75 PLUS SPORT Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210
/
4
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
5
5075
4700
1969
1865
1716
1710
2930
2710
407
/
Fuel Economy
11.9
/
74
58
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Front Row Seats
/
12
/
Front Row Seats
/
LCD
/
Driver Seat
/
Leather
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
12
/
8
/
SONY
Transmission
Automatic
8-Speed Automatic
/
8
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
Front Wheel Drive
Front Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
/
225/55 R19
/
225/55 R19
Key Spec
2.5 L - 3.7 L
2.0 L
226 BHP - 273 BHP
229 BHP - 233 BHP
Automatic
8-Speed Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
7 Seater
5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
Engine
2.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
226 BHP
233 BHP
420
390
/
2.0T GDI
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Normal, Economy
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Runflat Tyres
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Active Bonnet
- Collision Detection
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
CS75 PLUS SPORT
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Cool Box
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Keyless Start
- Remote key types
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Number of Airbags
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) if you care more about interior space; choose CS75 PLUS SPORT if you care more about power.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) has a fuel consumption of 8.4, while CS75 PLUS SPORT has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2930, while CS75 PLUS SPORT has a wheelbase of 2710. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) , offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive, while CS75 PLUS SPORT uses Front Drive.