CarteaCompare CarsMazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) vs Grand Santa Fe GDI AWD

Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) vs Grand Santa Fe GDI AWD Comparison

Car Information

8.3

/

Engine / Motor

210

207 km/h

4

/

Dimensions

7 Seater

7 Seater

5075

4905 mm

1969

2179 mm

1716

1695 mm

2930

2800 mm

407

634 L

Fuel Economy

11.9

9.7 Km/L

74

71 L

/

9.7 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

/

Front Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

/

Key Spec

2.5 L - 3.7 L

3.3 L - 3.5 L

226 BHP - 273 BHP

265 BHP - 286 BHP

Automatic

Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

7 Seater

7 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.5 L

3.3 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

226 BHP

286 BHP

420

320 Nm

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD)

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Push Button Start
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Runflat Tyres
    • Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Active Bonnet
    • Collision Detection
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Spare Wheel
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking
  • Grand Santa Fe GDI AWD

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickGrand Santa Fe GDI AWD

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) if you care more about fuel economy; choose Grand Santa Fe GDI AWD if you care more about power.

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) has a fuel consumption of 8.4, while Grand Santa Fe GDI AWD has a fuel consumption of 10.31. Therefore, Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2930, while Grand Santa Fe GDI AWD has a wheelbase of 2800 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) , offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive, while Grand Santa Fe GDI AWD uses All Wheel Drive.