Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) vs GS4 1.5T GB Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210
180 km/h
4
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
5075
4545 mm
1969
1856 mm
1716
1668 mm
2930
2680 mm
407
470 L
Fuel Economy
11.9
14.7 Km/L
74
55 L
/
14.7 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Key Spec
2.5 L - 3.7 L
1.5 L - 1.5 L
226 BHP - 273 BHP
165 BHP - 248
Automatic
8AT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
7 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
226 BHP
165 BHP
420
265 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Runflat Tyres
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Active Bonnet
- Collision Detection
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
GS4 1.5T GB
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickGS4 1.5T GB
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) if you care more about interior space; choose GS4 1.5T GB if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) has a fuel consumption of 8.4, while GS4 1.5T GB has a fuel consumption of 6.8. Therefore, GS4 1.5T GB is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2930, while GS4 1.5T GB has a wheelbase of 2680 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) , offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive, while GS4 1.5T GB uses Front Wheel Drive.