Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) vs Hongqi E-HS9 2023 Executive (6 Seats) Comparison

Car Information

8.3

6.5

Engine / Motor

210

/

4

N/A, Electric

Dimensions

7 Seater

6 Seater

5075

5209

1969

2010

1716

1731

2930

3110

407

/

Fuel Economy

11.9

/

74

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

Transmission

Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

/

Front Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

Key Spec

2.5 L - 3.7 L

/

226 BHP - 273 BHP

429 BHP - 543 BHP

Automatic

Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Electric

TBD

/

7 Seater

4 Seater - 7 Seater

/

TBD

/

320 km - 515 km

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.5 L

0.0 L

Gasoline

Electric

226 BHP

429 BHP

420

600

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD)

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Push Button Start
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Runflat Tyres
    • Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Active Bonnet
    • Collision Detection
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Spare Wheel
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking
  • Hongqi E-HS9 2023 Executive (6 Seats)

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Door Edge Protector
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Spare Wheel
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Lane Departure Warning

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickHongqi E-HS9 2023 Executive (6 Seats)

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) if you care more about overall equipment; choose Hongqi E-HS9 2023 Executive (6 Seats) if you care more about interior space.

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) has a fuel consumption of 8.4, while Hongqi E-HS9 2023 Executive (6 Seats) has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2930, while Hongqi E-HS9 2023 Executive (6 Seats) has a wheelbase of 3110. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Hongqi E-HS9 2023 Executive (6 Seats), offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive, while Hongqi E-HS9 2023 Executive (6 Seats) uses All Wheel Drive.