Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) vs V23 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210
/
4
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
5
5075
4220
1969
1915
1716
1845
2930
2735
407
/
/
19
/
1613
/
1641
/
42
/
40
Fuel Economy
11.9
/
74
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
7
Transmission
Automatic
AT
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
Front Wheel Drive
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
/
255/55 R19
/
255/55 R19
Key Spec
2.5 L - 3.7 L
/
226 BHP - 273 BHP
134
Automatic
AT
Gasoline & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
7 Seater
5
/
TBD
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.5 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
226 BHP
134
420
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Motor
/
180
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Runflat Tyres
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Active Bonnet
- Collision Detection
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
V23
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickV23
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) if you care more about interior space; choose V23 if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) has a fuel consumption of 8.4, while V23 has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2930, while V23 has a wheelbase of 2735. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) , offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive, while V23 uses No data.