Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T High Plus (AWD) vs SQ6 e-tron Comparison

Car Information

/

598 km

/

800V

Dimensions

7 Seater

5

5075

/

1969

/

1716

/

2930

/

/

514

/

64

Fuel Economy

74

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

11.9

/

Dinamica Microfibre

/

/

Sport Seats Plus

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

14.5

Battery/Charging

/

270

/

11

/

10 min

Transmission

Automatic

DHT

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Four-Wheel Drive

/

Wheels/brakes

/

/

/

Key Spec

2.5 L - 3.7 L

/

226 BHP - 273 BHP

TBD

Automatic

DHT

Gasoline & Petrol

Electric

TBD

/

7 Seater

5

/

TBD

/

TBD

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.5 L

/

Gasoline

Electric

226 BHP

/

420

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Motor

/

Lithium-ion

/

489

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T High Plus (AWD)

    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Door Edge Protector
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Active Bonnet
    • Collision Detection
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Spare Wheel
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking
  • SQ6 e-tron

    • 360 Degree Camera

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickSQ6 e-tron

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T High Plus (AWD) if you care more about overall equipment; choose SQ6 e-tron if you care more about overall equipment.

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T High Plus (AWD) has a fuel consumption of No data, while SQ6 e-tron has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T High Plus (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2930, while SQ6 e-tron has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T High Plus (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive, while SQ6 e-tron uses Four-Wheel Drive.