Mazda CX-90 2024 3.3L High Plus vs ZS EV Luxury Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210
/
6
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
5100
/
1994
/
1756
/
3010
/
566
/
/
17
Fuel Economy
9.1
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
10.1
/
6
Transmission
Automatic
DHT
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
All Wheel Drive
/
Key Spec
3.3 L - 3.3 L
/
340 HP - 345 BHP
175 BHP
8 SPEED SKYACTIV WITH Mi-DRIVE & Automatic
DHT
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
6 - 8
5 Seater
/
TBD
/
320Km
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.3 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
345 BHP
175 BHP
500
/
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda CX-90 2024 3.3L High Plus
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear AC Controls
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Tire Repair Kit
- Security System
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Crosswind Assist
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Speed Limiter
- Auto Door Lock
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
ZS EV Luxury
- Push Button Start
- Parking sensor rear
- EBA/BA
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Excellent energy consumption efficiency
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Advanced security features
Negative
- Medium electric driving range
- Slower charging compared to some competing cars
- Limited customization options
Related comparisons
Editor's PickZS EV Luxury
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda CX-90 2024 3.3L High Plus if you care more about power; choose ZS EV Luxury if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda CX-90 2024 3.3L High Plus has a fuel consumption of 10.99, while ZS EV Luxury has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda CX-90 2024 3.3L High Plus has a wheelbase of 3010, while ZS EV Luxury has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda CX-90 2024 3.3L High Plus uses All Wheel Drive, while ZS EV Luxury uses No data.