Mazda CX3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) vs Nissan Kicks 2021 1.6 SV Comparison
Car Information
8.3
/
✓
/
Engine / Motor
190
180
4
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
✓
/
4.275
4295
1.765
1960
1.535
1590
2.570
2620
240
432
Fuel Economy
15.4
15.4
48
41
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
1.6 L - 2.0 L
145 BHP - 148 BHP
118 BHP - 142 BHP
6 Speed SkyActiv with Sports Mode & Automatic
Automatic & CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 Seater - 5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
1.6 L
Petrol
Gasoline
148 BHP
118 BHP
192
149
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda CX3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Nissan Kicks 2021 1.6 SV
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and trend compliant design
- High fuel economy for efficiency
- Effective use of internal space
Negative
- Engine performance is limited
- Slow transmission response
- The quality of interior materials is average
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMazda CX3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda CX3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) if you care more about price; choose Nissan Kicks 2021 1.6 SV if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda CX3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) has a fuel consumption of 6.49, while Nissan Kicks 2021 1.6 SV has a fuel consumption of 6.49. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda CX3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2.570, while Nissan Kicks 2021 1.6 SV has a wheelbase of 2620. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Nissan Kicks 2021 1.6 SV, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda CX3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive, while Nissan Kicks 2021 1.6 SV uses Front Wheel Drive.