Mazda CX3 2024 2.0L GTX (AWD) vs CX90 High Plus Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
210 km/h
4
6
/
3289 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
✓
/
4.275
5100 mm
1.765
1994 mm
1.535
1745 mm
2.570
3010 mm
240
566 L
/
5 Doors
/
201 m
Fuel Economy
14.3
10.5 Km/L
48
71 L
/
10.5 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Vinyl Upholstery
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
9.25
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
8
✓
/
/
✓
/
Standard LCD
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2000 L
3.3 L
147 BHP - 148 BHP
284 BHP - 345 BHP
Automatic
8-speed Automatic & Automatic
Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
7 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
3.3 L
Petrol
Gasoline
148 BHP
345 BHP
192
500 Nm
/
V
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda CX3 2024 2.0L GTX (AWD)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Blind Spot Warning
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
CX90 High Plus
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Sensor Rear Tailgate
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda CX3 2024 2.0L GTX (AWD) if you care more about fuel economy; choose CX90 High Plus if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda CX3 2024 2.0L GTX (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 6.99, while CX90 High Plus has a fuel consumption of 9.52. Therefore, Mazda CX3 2024 2.0L GTX (AWD) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda CX3 2024 2.0L GTX (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2.570, while CX90 High Plus has a wheelbase of 3010 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, CX90 High Plus, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda CX3 2024 2.0L GTX (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive, while CX90 High Plus uses All Wheel Drive.