Mazda CX3 2024 2.0L GTX (AWD) vs T1 Comfort 2026 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
/
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
✓
/
4.275
4705
1.765
1967
1.535
1843
2.570
2800
240
574
/
1690
/
1700
/
199
Fuel Economy
14.3
/
48
70
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
Rear
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
8AT
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Drive
/
MacPherson
/
Multi-link
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
Disc
/
235/60 R19
/
235/60 R19
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
2.0
145 BHP - 148 BHP
254
6 Speed SkyActiv with Sports Mode & Automatic
8AT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
2.0
Petrol
Gasoline
148 BHP
254
192
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda CX3 2024 2.0L GTX (AWD)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Blind Spot Warning
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
T1 Comfort 2026
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Active Safety Warning System
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Strong performance in its price category
- Spacious and comfortable interior
Negative
- Fuel economy can be improved
- Limited options for the entertainment system
- A less widespread agent network
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMazda CX3 2024 2.0L GTX (AWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda CX3 2024 2.0L GTX (AWD) if you care more about price; choose T1 Comfort 2026 if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda CX3 2024 2.0L GTX (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 6.99, while T1 Comfort 2026 has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda CX3 2024 2.0L GTX (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2.570, while T1 Comfort 2026 has a wheelbase of 2800. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, T1 Comfort 2026, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda CX3 2024 2.0L GTX (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive, while T1 Comfort 2026 uses Front Drive.