Mazda CX3 2024 Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GTL (FWD) vs GLE 350 Comparison
Car Information
8.3
/
✓
/
Engine / Motor
190
/
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
/
4.275
/
1.765
/
1.535
/
2.570
/
240
/
Fuel Economy
15.4
/
48
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
/
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2000 L
TBD
145 BHP - 148 BHP
TBD
Automatic
TBD
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2000 L
/
Petrol
/
148 BHP
/
192
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda CX3 2024 Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GTL (FWD)
- Keyless Entry
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
GLE 350
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickGLE 350
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda CX3 2024 Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GTL (FWD) if you care more about overall equipment; choose GLE 350 if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda CX3 2024 Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GTL (FWD) has a fuel consumption of 6.49, while GLE 350 has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda CX3 2024 Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GTL (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2.570, while GLE 350 has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda CX3 2024 Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GTL (FWD) uses All Wheel Drive, while GLE 350 uses No data.