Mazda CX30 2024 2.0L Signature AWD vs GS4 1.5T GB Comparison
Car Information
✓
/
/
SUVEngine / Motor
192
180 km/h
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4.395
4545 mm
1.795
1856 mm
1.562
1668 mm
2.655
2680 mm
430
470 L
Fuel Economy
15.6
14.7 Km/L
48
55 L
/
14.7 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
✓
/
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.5 L
1.5 L
155 BHP - 189 BHP
165 BHP
Automatic
TBD
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
1.5 L
Petrol
Gasoline
155 BHP
165 BHP
200
265 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda CX30 2024 2.0L Signature AWD
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Seats - Comfort
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Active Bonnet
- Acceleration Skid Control
- Collision Detection
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
GS4 1.5T GB
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickGS4 1.5T GB
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda CX30 2024 2.0L Signature AWD if you care more about fuel economy; choose GS4 1.5T GB if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda CX30 2024 2.0L Signature AWD has a fuel consumption of 6.41, while GS4 1.5T GB has a fuel consumption of 6.8. Therefore, Mazda CX30 2024 2.0L Signature AWD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda CX30 2024 2.0L Signature AWD has a wheelbase of 2.655, while GS4 1.5T GB has a wheelbase of 2680 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, GS4 1.5T GB, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda CX30 2024 2.0L Signature AWD uses All Wheel Drive, while GS4 1.5T GB uses Front Wheel Drive.