Mazda CX30 2024 2.0L Signature AWD vs EV9 2WD SHORT RANGE (Air) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
192
190
4
N/A, Electric
Dimensions
5 Seater
7
4.395
5009
1.795
1979
1.562
1750
2.655
3099
430
572
Fuel Economy
15.6
/
48
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
E-SHIFT (SBW)
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
✓
/
All Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.5 L
/
155 BHP - 189 BHP
201 BHP - 380
Automatic
Automatic & Automatic & E-SHIFT (SBW)
Gasoline & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
5 Seater
6 - 7
/
TBD
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
SINGLE
Petrol
Electric
155 BHP
215 BHP
200
350
/
SINGLE
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda CX30 2024 2.0L Signature AWD
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Seats - Comfort
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Active Bonnet
- Acceleration Skid Control
- Collision Detection
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
EV9 2WD SHORT RANGE (Air)
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEV9 2WD SHORT RANGE (Air)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda CX30 2024 2.0L Signature AWD if you care more about overall equipment; choose EV9 2WD SHORT RANGE (Air) if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda CX30 2024 2.0L Signature AWD has a fuel consumption of 6.41, while EV9 2WD SHORT RANGE (Air) has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda CX30 2024 2.0L Signature AWD has a wheelbase of 2.655, while EV9 2WD SHORT RANGE (Air) has a wheelbase of 3099. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EV9 2WD SHORT RANGE (Air), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda CX30 2024 2.0L Signature AWD uses All Wheel Drive, while EV9 2WD SHORT RANGE (Air) uses Rear Wheel Drive.