Mazda CX30 2024 2.0L Urban AWD vs Avatr 11 2024 Avatr 11 2024 AWD Comparison
Car Information
✓
/
/
4.5
Engine / Motor
192
200
4
N/A, Electric
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4.395
4.880
1.795
1.970
1.562
1.601
2.655
2.975
430
489
Fuel Economy
15.6
/
48
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
680
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
✓
✓
✓
✓
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.5 L
/
155 BHP - 189 BHP
570 BHP
Automatic
TBD
Gasoline & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
5 Seater
5 Seater
/
TBD
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Engine
2.0 L
0.0 L
Petrol
Electric
155 BHP
570 BHP
200
650
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Motor
/
Double
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda CX30 2024 2.0L Urban AWD
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Seats - Comfort
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Active Bonnet
- Acceleration Skid Control
- Collision Detection
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
Avatr 11 2024 Avatr 11 2024 AWD
- 360 Degree Camera
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickAvatr 11 2024 Avatr 11 2024 AWD
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda CX30 2024 2.0L Urban AWD if you care more about overall equipment; choose Avatr 11 2024 Avatr 11 2024 AWD if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda CX30 2024 2.0L Urban AWD has a fuel consumption of 6.41, while Avatr 11 2024 Avatr 11 2024 AWD has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda CX30 2024 2.0L Urban AWD has a wheelbase of 2.655, while Avatr 11 2024 Avatr 11 2024 AWD has a wheelbase of 2.975. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Avatr 11 2024 Avatr 11 2024 AWD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda CX30 2024 2.0L Urban AWD uses All Wheel Drive, while Avatr 11 2024 Avatr 11 2024 AWD uses All Wheel Drive.