Mazda CX5 2024 2.5L Classic vs EX5 Pro Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200
/
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4.550
4615
1.840
1901
1.675
1670
2.700
2750
506
/
/
18
Fuel Economy
14.7
/
58
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Driver Seat
/
10.2
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
PVC Leather
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
6
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
15.4
/
6
Transmission
Automatic
AT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
/
Key Spec
1.9 L - 2.5 L
/
151 BHP - 190 BHP
218
6-Speed Automatic & Automatic
AT
Gasoline & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
5 Seater
5
/
TBD
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
/
Petrol
Electric
188 BHP
218
251
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda CX5 2024 2.5L Classic
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Crash Auto Door Unlock
- Auto Door Lock
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
EX5 Pro
- 360 Degree Camera
- Keyless Entry
- Keyless Start
- Remote key types
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEX5 Pro
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda CX5 2024 2.5L Classic if you care more about overall equipment; choose EX5 Pro if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda CX5 2024 2.5L Classic has a fuel consumption of 6.8, while EX5 Pro has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda CX5 2024 2.5L Classic has a wheelbase of 2.700, while EX5 Pro has a wheelbase of 2750. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EX5 Pro, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda CX5 2024 2.5L Classic uses Front Wheel Drive, while EX5 Pro uses No data.