Mazda CX9 2024 2.5T GS (FWD) vs RAV4 2.5L EXR Hybrid Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210
200 km/h
4
4
/
2490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
✓
/
5.075
4600 mm
1.969
1855 mm
1.716
1685 mm
2.930
2660 mm
407
/
/
5 Doors
Fuel Economy
11.8
24.4 Km/L
74
55 L
/
24.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.5 L - 3.7 L
2.5 L - 2.5 L
226 BHP - 273 BHP
170 - 219
Automatic
8 Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic & Continuous Variable Transmission (CVT)
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
7 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.5 L
2.5 L
Petrol
Hybrid
230 BHP
203 BHP
420
342 Nm
/
In-Line
/
None
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda CX9 2024 2.5T GS (FWD)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Rollover stability control
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Blind Spot Warning
- Crash Auto Door Unlock
- Auto Door Lock
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
RAV4 2.5L EXR Hybrid
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Economical in fuel consumption with strong performance
- Spacious and practical interior space
- Reliability and quality of safety equipment
Negative
- The suspension is a bit stiff
- Use of lower quality interior materials
- Less control of internal noise
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda CX9 2024 2.5T GS (FWD) if you care more about power; choose RAV4 2.5L EXR Hybrid if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda CX9 2024 2.5T GS (FWD) has a fuel consumption of 8.47, while RAV4 2.5L EXR Hybrid has a fuel consumption of 4.1. Therefore, RAV4 2.5L EXR Hybrid is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda CX9 2024 2.5T GS (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2.930, while RAV4 2.5L EXR Hybrid has a wheelbase of 2660 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, RAV4 2.5L EXR Hybrid, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda CX9 2024 2.5T GS (FWD) uses All Wheel Drive, while RAV4 2.5L EXR Hybrid uses All Wheel Drive.