Mazda MX-5 RF vs BMW Z1 Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
2
/
195 / 50 / R16
/
3915
/
1735
/
1230
/
Fuel Economy
45 LITRES
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
TELESCOPIC ADJUSTMENT
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
DSC
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
9
/
BOSE
/
Transmission
6 SPEED SKYACTIV
/
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Exterior
كهربائي
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
DUAL CHROME EXHAUST
/
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0L
/
Gasoline
/
INLINE 4 CYLINDER 16 VALVE DOHC
/
181HP
/
181HP @ 7000 RPM
/
205NM
/
205NM @ 4000 RPM
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda MX-5 RF
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Steering Adjustment
- Blind Spot Warning
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Speed Alert
- Lane Departure Warning
BMW Z1
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickBMW Z1
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda MX-5 RF if you care more about overall equipment; choose BMW Z1 if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda MX-5 RF has a fuel consumption of No data, while BMW Z1 has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda MX-5 RF has a wheelbase of No data, while BMW Z1 has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda MX-5 RF uses Rear Drive, while BMW Z1 uses No data.