Mazda3 EVOLVE vs EQM5 T3 Edition Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
5
4 Seater
215/45/R18
/
4660
5040 mm
1795
1910 mm
1440
1569 mm
2725
2990 mm
/
433 L
Fuel Economy
16.8
/
51
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
/
Transmission
6 SPEED SKYACTIV WITH SPORTS MODE
/
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
/
153 BHP - 153 BHP
134 BHP
6 SPEED SKYACTIV WITH SPORTS MODE & Automatic
DHT
Gasoline
Electric
TBD
/
5 - 5
4 Seater - 5
/
TBD
/
TBD
Exterior
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0L
/
Gasoline
Electric
SKYACTIV-G 4 CYLINDER
/
153 HP
134 BHP
153 HP @ 6000 RPM
/
200
/
200 NM @ 4000 RPM
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda3 EVOLVE
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Blind Spot Warning
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Auto Door Lock
EQM5 T3 Edition
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEQM5 T3 Edition
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda3 EVOLVE if you care more about power; choose EQM5 T3 Edition if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda3 EVOLVE has a fuel consumption of 5.95, while EQM5 T3 Edition has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda3 EVOLVE has a wheelbase of 2725, while EQM5 T3 Edition has a wheelbase of 2990 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EQM5 T3 Edition, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda3 EVOLVE uses No data, while EQM5 T3 Edition uses Front Wheel Drive.