Mazda3 EVOLVE vs H7 2.0T Comfortable Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
215/45/R18
/
4660
5095 mm
1795
1875 mm
1440
1485 mm
2725
2970 mm
Fuel Economy
16.8
16.7 Km/L
51
70 L
/
16.7 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
/
Transmission
6 SPEED SKYACTIV WITH SPORTS MODE
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
1.8 L - 3.0 L
153 BHP - 153 BHP
138 BHP - 228 BHP
6 SPEED SKYACTIV WITH SPORTS MODE & Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 Seater
Exterior
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
2.0L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
SKYACTIV-G 4 CYLINDER
/
153 HP
204 BHP
153 HP @ 6000 RPM
/
200
260 Nm
200 NM @ 4000 RPM
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda3 EVOLVE
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Blind Spot Warning
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Auto Door Lock
H7 2.0T Comfortable
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickH7 2.0T Comfortable
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda3 EVOLVE if you care more about fuel economy; choose H7 2.0T Comfortable if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda3 EVOLVE has a fuel consumption of 5.95, while H7 2.0T Comfortable has a fuel consumption of 5.99. Therefore, Mazda3 EVOLVE is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda3 EVOLVE has a wheelbase of 2725, while H7 2.0T Comfortable has a wheelbase of 2970 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, H7 2.0T Comfortable, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda3 EVOLVE uses No data, while H7 2.0T Comfortable uses Front Wheel Drive.