Mazda3 EVOLVE vs Jetta 2.0 S Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
193 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
215/45/R18
/
4660
4659 mm
1795
1778 mm
1440
1482 mm
2725
2651 mm
/
510 L
Fuel Economy
16.8
14.1 Km/L
51
55 L
/
14.1 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
/
Transmission
6 SPEED SKYACTIV WITH SPORTS MODE
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
2.0 L - 2.5 L
153 BHP - 153 BHP
115 BHP - 170 BHP
6 SPEED SKYACTIV WITH SPORTS MODE & Automatic
7 Speed DSG Transmission & Automatic & Manual
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 - 5
Exterior
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
2.0L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
SKYACTIV-G 4 CYLINDER
/
153 HP
115 BHP
153 HP @ 6000 RPM
/
200
170 Nm
200 NM @ 4000 RPM
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda3 EVOLVE
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Blind Spot Warning
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Auto Door Lock
Jetta 2.0 S
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickJetta 2.0 S
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda3 EVOLVE if you care more about fuel economy; choose Jetta 2.0 S if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda3 EVOLVE has a fuel consumption of 5.95, while Jetta 2.0 S has a fuel consumption of 7.09. Therefore, Mazda3 EVOLVE is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda3 EVOLVE has a wheelbase of 2725, while Jetta 2.0 S has a wheelbase of 2651 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mazda3 EVOLVE, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda3 EVOLVE uses No data, while Jetta 2.0 S uses Front Wheel Drive.