Mazda3 Hatchback Intense vs Golf R Base 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
260 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
European
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
215/45/R18
/
4460
4290 mm
1795
1789 mm
1435
1458 mm
2725
2631 mm
/
4 Doors
/
341 L
/
120 m
Fuel Economy
16.8
9.7 Km/L
51
55 L
/
9.7 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
3-Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Bucket
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
12
8
Bose
/
/
10
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
Transmission
6 SPEED SKYACTIV WITH SPORTS MODE
/
Chassis & Steering
/
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
2.0 L - 2.0 L
151 BHP - 153 HP
292 BHP - 333 BHP
6 SPEED SKYACTIV WITH SPORTS MODE & Automatic
7 Speed DSG & Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
SKYACTIV-G 4 CYLINDER
/
153 HP
320 BHP
153 HP @ 6000 RPM
/
200
400 Nm
200 NM @ 4000 RPM
/
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda3 Hatchback Intense
- 360 Degree Camera
- Keyless Entry
- Front Cross Traffic Alert
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Blind Spot Warning
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Golf R Base 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda3 Hatchback Intense if you care more about price; choose Golf R Base 2.0T if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda3 Hatchback Intense has a fuel consumption of 5.95, while Golf R Base 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10.31. Therefore, Mazda3 Hatchback Intense is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda3 Hatchback Intense has a wheelbase of 2725, while Golf R Base 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2631 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mazda3 Hatchback Intense, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda3 Hatchback Intense uses No data, while Golf R Base 2.0T uses All Wheel Drive.