Mazda3 SELECT vs Passat 2.5L Trendline Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
190 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
205/60/R16
/
4660
4910 mm
1795
1835 mm
1440
1472 mm
2725
2803 mm
/
450 L
Fuel Economy
16.8
10.6 Km/L
51
70 L
/
10.6 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
/
Transmission
6 SPEED SKYACTIV WITH SPORTS MODE
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L
1.8 L - 2500 L
153 BHP
102 BHP - 170 BHP
Automatic
7 Speed DSG Transmission & Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.0L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
SKYACTIV-G 4 CYLINDER
/
153 HP
170 BHP
153 HP @ 6000 RPM
/
200
200 Nm
200 NM @ 4000 RPM
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda3 SELECT
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Auto Door Lock
Passat 2.5L Trendline
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickPassat 2.5L Trendline
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda3 SELECT if you care more about fuel economy; choose Passat 2.5L Trendline if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda3 SELECT has a fuel consumption of 5.95, while Passat 2.5L Trendline has a fuel consumption of 9.43. Therefore, Mazda3 SELECT is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda3 SELECT has a wheelbase of 2725, while Passat 2.5L Trendline has a wheelbase of 2803 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Passat 2.5L Trendline, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda3 SELECT uses No data, while Passat 2.5L Trendline uses Front Wheel Drive.