Mazda3 SELECT vs Polo Sedan S Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
185 km/h
Dimensions
5
4 Seater
205/60/R16
/
4660
4384 mm
1795
1699 mm
1440
1465 mm
2725
2552 mm
/
455 L
Fuel Economy
16.8
14.3 Km/L
51
55 L
/
14.3 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
/
Transmission
6 SPEED SKYACTIV WITH SPORTS MODE
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L
/
153 BHP
/
Automatic
/
Gasoline
/
TBD
/
5 Seater
/
Exterior
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
2.0L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
SKYACTIV-G 4 CYLINDER
/
153 HP
105 BHP
153 HP @ 6000 RPM
/
200
153 Nm
200 NM @ 4000 RPM
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda3 SELECT
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Auto Door Lock
Polo Sedan S
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickPolo Sedan S
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda3 SELECT if you care more about fuel economy; choose Polo Sedan S if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda3 SELECT has a fuel consumption of 5.95, while Polo Sedan S has a fuel consumption of 6.99. Therefore, Mazda3 SELECT is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda3 SELECT has a wheelbase of 2725, while Polo Sedan S has a wheelbase of 2552 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mazda3 SELECT, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda3 SELECT uses No data, while Polo Sedan S uses Front Wheel Drive.