Mazda3 SELECT vs Seal 6 Design Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
180
Dimensions
5
5
205/60/R16
/
4660
4830
1795
1875
1440
1495
2725
2790
/
1630
/
4
/
491
Fuel Economy
16.8
16.95
51
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
/
Dual
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
8
/
/
12.8"
Battery/Charging
/
3.3
Transmission
6 SPEED SKYACTIV WITH SPORTS MODE
eCVT
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
1.5
153 BHP - 153 BHP
174
6 SPEED SKYACTIV WITH SPORTS MODE & Automatic
eCVT
Gasoline
Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5
Exterior
Electric
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
2.0L
1.5
Gasoline
Hybrid
SKYACTIV-G 4 CYLINDER
/
153 HP
174
153 HP @ 6000 RPM
/
200
/
200 NM @ 4000 RPM
/
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Motor
/
Lithium iron phosphate battery
/
161
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda3 SELECT
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Auto Door Lock
Seal 6 Design
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMazda3 SELECT
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda3 SELECT if you care more about price; choose Seal 6 Design if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda3 SELECT has a fuel consumption of 5.95, while Seal 6 Design has a fuel consumption of 5.9. Therefore, Seal 6 Design is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda3 SELECT has a wheelbase of 2725, while Seal 6 Design has a wheelbase of 2790. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Seal 6 Design, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda3 SELECT uses No data, while Seal 6 Design uses Front Drive.