Mazda6 PURE vs Qin L EV 470 RWD Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
5
5
225 / 55 / R17
/
4870
4720
1840
1880
1450
1495
2830
2820
Fuel Economy
15.8
/
62
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
Transmission
6 Sp SkyActiv with Sports Mode
DHT
Wheels/brakes
/
225/55 R17
/
225/55 R17
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.5 L
/
151 BHP - 231 BHP
150 BHP
6 Sp SkyActiv with Sports Mode & Automatic
DHT
Gasoline & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
5 - 5
5
/
TBD
/
TBD
Exterior
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
dual
/
Engine
2.5L
/
Gasoline
Electric
SKYACTIV-G 4 Cylinder
/
185 HP
150 BHP
185 HP @ 5700 RPM
/
250 NM @ 3250 RPM
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda6 PURE
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Auto Door Lock
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
Qin L EV 470 RWD
Review Comparison
Positive
- Stylish and modern exterior design
- High internal manufacturing quality
- Great driving and control fun
Negative
- The back space may be tight
- The suspension system can be harsh on off road
- The interface of some technologies needs improvements
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickQin L EV 470 RWD
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda6 PURE if you care more about interior space; choose Qin L EV 470 RWD if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda6 PURE has a fuel consumption of 6.33, while Qin L EV 470 RWD has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda6 PURE has a wheelbase of 2830, while Qin L EV 470 RWD has a wheelbase of 2820. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mazda6 PURE, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda6 PURE uses No data, while Qin L EV 470 RWD uses No data.