Mazda6 PURE vs Qin Plus FWD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
185
Dimensions
5
5
225 / 55 / R17
17
4870
4765
1840
1837
1450
1495
2830
2720
/
Flush Door
/
1500
/
4
/
500
Fuel Economy
15.8
26
62
48
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
8.8
/
LCD
/
Front Row Seats
/
Sensatec Leather
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
Driver's and Passenger airbags, Front-row side airbag
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front Row
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
6
6
/
10.1-inch rotating screen
Battery/Charging
/
6.6
Transmission
6 Sp SkyActiv with Sports Mode
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Drive
/
MacPherson
/
Torsion Beam
Wheels/brakes
/
Ventilated Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.5 L
1.5 L
151 BHP - 231 BHP
177 BHP - 197 BHP
6 Sp SkyActiv with Sports Mode & Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5
Exterior
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
dual
/
/
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.5L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Hybrid
SKYACTIV-G 4 Cylinder
Plug in Hybrid
185 HP
197 BHP
185 HP @ 5700 RPM
/
250 NM @ 3250 RPM
325
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Sport, Ordinary, Economical
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Motor
/
145
/
325
/
1
/
Lithium iron phosphate battery
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda6 PURE
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Auto Door Lock
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
Qin Plus FWD
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBA/BA
- Child Lock
- Seat belt reminder
Review Comparison
Positive
- Stylish and modern exterior design
- High internal manufacturing quality
- Great driving and control fun
Negative
- The back space may be tight
- The suspension system can be harsh on off road
- The interface of some technologies needs improvements
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda6 PURE if you care more about price; choose Qin Plus FWD if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda6 PURE has a fuel consumption of 6.33, while Qin Plus FWD has a fuel consumption of 3.85. Therefore, Qin Plus FWD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda6 PURE has a wheelbase of 2830, while Qin Plus FWD has a wheelbase of 2720. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mazda6 PURE, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda6 PURE uses No data, while Qin Plus FWD uses Front Drive.