McLaren 650S 2016 Coupe vs AMG GT 63 4MATIC Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
333
315 km/h
8
8
/
3982 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
2 Seater
2 Seater
4512
4728 mm
2093
1984 mm
1203
1354 mm
2670
2700 mm
/
2 Doors
/
350 L
Fuel Economy
8.5
4 Km/L
72
80 L
/
4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.8 L
4.0 L - 4.0 L
640 BHP
429 HP - 831 hp
Automatic
9-speed automatic & AMG SPEEDSHIFT® MCT 9-speed & Automatic & SPEEDSHIFT® TCT 9-speed
Gasoline
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
TBD
TBD
2 Seater
2 Seater - 4
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
3.8 L
4.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
640 BHP
577 BHP
678
800 Nm
/
V
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
McLaren 650S 2016 Coupe
- Steering Adjustment
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
AMG GT 63 4MATIC
- Remote key types
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMcLaren 650S 2016 Coupe
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose McLaren 650S 2016 Coupe if you care more about price; choose AMG GT 63 4MATIC if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, McLaren 650S 2016 Coupe has a fuel consumption of 11.76, while AMG GT 63 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of 25. Therefore, McLaren 650S 2016 Coupe is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, McLaren 650S 2016 Coupe has a wheelbase of 2670, while AMG GT 63 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 2700 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, AMG GT 63 4MATIC, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. McLaren 650S 2016 Coupe uses Rear Wheel Drive, while AMG GT 63 4MATIC uses All Wheel Drive.