Mercedes-AMG GLC 43 4MATIC vs EQE 350 4MATIC SUV Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250
210
Dimensions
5
5
4,749
4,863
1,920
1,940
1,635
1,685
2,873
3,030
/
2,580
Fuel Economy
10
/
66
/
Comfort
✓
/
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
Burmester®
/
Transmission
9-speed automatic
Single-speed AT
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0L
/
Gasoline
Electric
2.0 L turbo-inline-4 with EQ Boost mild-hybrid
/
✓
/
416
288
312
215
500
765
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mercedes-AMG GLC 43 4MATIC
- 360 Degree Camera
EQE 350 4MATIC SUV
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEQE 350 4MATIC SUV
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mercedes-AMG GLC 43 4MATIC if you care more about power; choose EQE 350 4MATIC SUV if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mercedes-AMG GLC 43 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of 10, while EQE 350 4MATIC SUV has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mercedes-AMG GLC 43 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 2,873 , while EQE 350 4MATIC SUV has a wheelbase of 3,030. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EQE 350 4MATIC SUV, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mercedes-AMG GLC 43 4MATIC uses Four-Wheel Drive, while EQE 350 4MATIC SUV uses Four-Wheel Drive.