Mercedes-AMG GLC 43 4MATIC vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR Comparison

Car Information

4.8

/

Engine / Motor

250

210 km/h

/

6

/

3490 cc

/

GCC

Dimensions

5

7 Seater

4,749

5115 mm

1,920

1980 mm

1,635

1920 mm

2,873 

2890 mm

/

5 Doors

/

1004 L

/

221 m

Fuel Economy

10

9.4 Km/L

66

110 L

/

9.4 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

/

Interior

Front Row Seats

Front Row Seats

Driver Seat

/

/

/

/

Fabric

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

Standard

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

Burmester®

/

/

9

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

6

Transmission

9-speed automatic

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Four-Wheel Drive

Four Wheel Drive

Key Spec

2.0L

3.3 L - 5.7 L

416 - 671

240 BHP - 409

9-speed automatic

10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode & Automatic & Manual

Gasoline & Hybrid

Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5

7 - 8 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

V

2.0L

4.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

2.0 L turbo-inline-4 with EQ Boost mild-hybrid

/

Twin Turbo

416

271 BHP

312

/

500

385 Nm

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Mercedes-AMG GLC 43 4MATIC

    • 360 Degree Camera
  • Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Sensor Rear Tailgate
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Powerful off-road capabilities
  • Exceptional reliability and durability
  • Interior comfort and luxury equipment

Negative

  • High fuel consumption
  • High purchase and maintenance costs
  • Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight

Related comparisons

Editor's PickLand Cruiser 4.0L EXR

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Mercedes-AMG GLC 43 4MATIC if you care more about fuel economy; choose Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mercedes Benz | Mercedes-AMG GLC 43 4MATIC

VS

Jaguar | Jaguar F Pace 2021 5.0L V8 SVR (550 PS)

Mercedes Benz | Mercedes-AMG GLC 43 4MATIC

VS

Lincoln | Lincoln Navigator 2021 3.5T Presidential (AWD)

Mercedes Benz | Mercedes-AMG GLC 43 4MATIC

VS

Lincoln | Lincoln Navigator 2020 3.5T Presidential (AWD)

Mercedes Benz | Mercedes-AMG GLC 43 4MATIC

VS

Tesla | Tesla Model X 2023 Long Range (AWD)

Mercedes Benz | Mercedes-AMG GLC 43 4MATIC

VS

Mercedes Benz | EQE 350 4MATIC SUV

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Mercedes-AMG GLC 43 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of 10, while Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR has a fuel consumption of 10.64. Therefore, Mercedes-AMG GLC 43 4MATIC is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Mercedes-AMG GLC 43 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 2,873 , while Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR has a wheelbase of 2890 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mercedes-AMG GLC 43 4MATIC uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR uses Four Wheel Drive.