Mercedes-AMG GLC 43 4MATIC vs Sequoia Limited Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250
200 km/h
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
4,749
5285 mm
1,920
2021 mm
1,635
1892 mm
2,873
3100 mm
/
5 Doors
/
2460 L
Fuel Economy
10
9 Km/L
66
85 L
/
9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
Burmester®
/
/
✓
Transmission
9-speed automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0L
3.5 L - 5.7 L
416 - 671
381 BHP - 437 BHP
9-speed automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Hybrid
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5
7 Seater - 8 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0L
3.5 L
Gasoline
Hybrid
2.0 L turbo-inline-4 with EQ Boost mild-hybrid
/
✓
/
416
437 BHP
312
/
500
790 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mercedes-AMG GLC 43 4MATIC
- 360 Degree Camera
Sequoia Limited
- Rear Camera
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Spacious interior space
- Powerful engine performance
- High level of reliability
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Limited technical options
- Relatively high price
Related comparisons
Editor's PickSequoia Limited
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mercedes-AMG GLC 43 4MATIC if you care more about fuel economy; choose Sequoia Limited if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mercedes-AMG GLC 43 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of 10, while Sequoia Limited has a fuel consumption of 11.11. Therefore, Mercedes-AMG GLC 43 4MATIC is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mercedes-AMG GLC 43 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 2,873 , while Sequoia Limited has a wheelbase of 3100 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Sequoia Limited, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mercedes-AMG GLC 43 4MATIC uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Sequoia Limited uses All Wheel Drive.