Mercedes-AMG GLE 53 4MATIC+ vs Tiggo7 Pro Max COM Comparison
Car Information
SUV
/
5.1
/
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
/
6
/
2999 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4 Doors
5
4924 mm
4500
1948 mm
1842
1796 mm
1746
2995 mm
2670
655 L
/
198 m
/
/
Flush Door
/
18
Fuel Economy
11
16.6
85 L
/
9 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
Interior
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Driver Seat
/
12.3
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
12.3
✓
/
✓
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
9-speed automatic
7DCT
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Drive
Exterior
✓
/
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
3.0 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
429 BHP
197 BHP
320
/
560 Nm
290
/
1.6L TDGI
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mercedes-AMG GLE 53 4MATIC+
- Remote key types
Tiggo7 Pro Max COM
- 360 Degree Camera
- Push Button Start
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Steering Adjustment
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickTiggo7 Pro Max COM
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mercedes-AMG GLE 53 4MATIC+ if you care more about interior space; choose Tiggo7 Pro Max COM if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mercedes-AMG GLE 53 4MATIC+ has a fuel consumption of 9.09, while Tiggo7 Pro Max COM has a fuel consumption of 6.02. Therefore, Tiggo7 Pro Max COM is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mercedes-AMG GLE 53 4MATIC+ has a wheelbase of 2995 mm, while Tiggo7 Pro Max COM has a wheelbase of 2670. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mercedes-AMG GLE 53 4MATIC+, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mercedes-AMG GLE 53 4MATIC+ uses All Wheel Drive, while Tiggo7 Pro Max COM uses Front Drive.