Mercedes-AMG GLS 63 4MATIC+ vs Bentayga 4.0L V8 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250
290 km/h
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
2,700
/
5,207
5140 mm
1,956
1998 mm
1,823
1742 mm
3,135
2995 mm
/
484 L
Fuel Economy
10
8.8 Km/L
90
85 L
/
8.8 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
/
✓
Transmission
9-speed automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
4.0L
4.0 L - 6.0 L
612
542 BHP - 626 BHP
9-speed automatic
Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
7
5 Seater
Engine
V
/
4.0L
4.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
/
/
twin-turbo
/
612
542 BHP
450
/
850
770 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mercedes-AMG GLS 63 4MATIC+
- 360 Degree Camera
- Blind Spot Warning
Bentayga 4.0L V8
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickBentayga 4.0L V8
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mercedes-AMG GLS 63 4MATIC+ if you care more about fuel economy; choose Bentayga 4.0L V8 if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mercedes-AMG GLS 63 4MATIC+ has a fuel consumption of 10, while Bentayga 4.0L V8 has a fuel consumption of 11.36. Therefore, Mercedes-AMG GLS 63 4MATIC+ is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mercedes-AMG GLS 63 4MATIC+ has a wheelbase of 3,135, while Bentayga 4.0L V8 has a wheelbase of 2995 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mercedes-AMG GLS 63 4MATIC+, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mercedes-AMG GLS 63 4MATIC+ uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Bentayga 4.0L V8 uses All Wheel Drive.