Mercedes-AMG GLS 63 4MATIC+ vs EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250
260 km/h
/
GCC
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
2,700
/
5,207
5125 mm
1,956
2157 mm
1,823
1718 mm
3,135
3210 mm
/
5 Doors
/
645 L
Fuel Economy
10
/
90
/
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
9-speed automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
4.0L
/
612
357 BHP - 650
9-speed automatic
1-speed direct drive (EV) & Automatic & Single-speed automatic & Single-speed automatic (EV)
Gasoline
Electric
TBD
/
7
5 - 7 Seater
/
TBD
/
485 km - 700 km
Engine
V
/
4.0L
/
Gasoline
Electric
/
/
twin-turbo
/
612
357 BHP
450
/
850
800 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Exterior
/
✓
Motor
/
10
/
options.Lithium-ion
/
265 kW
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mercedes-AMG GLS 63 4MATIC+
- 360 Degree Camera
- Blind Spot Warning
EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC
- Remote key types
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEQS 450 SUV 4MATIC
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mercedes-AMG GLS 63 4MATIC+ if you care more about power; choose EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mercedes-AMG GLS 63 4MATIC+ has a fuel consumption of 10, while EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mercedes-AMG GLS 63 4MATIC+ has a wheelbase of 3,135, while EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 3210 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mercedes-AMG GLS 63 4MATIC+ uses Four-Wheel Drive, while EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC uses All Wheel Drive.