Mercedes‑AMG GT 63 S 4MATIC+ 4‑Door vs RC 350 F Sport Platinum 3.5L Comparison
Car Information
3.2
/
Engine / Motor
315
260 km/h
/
6
/
3490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
4
4 Seater
5,024
4700 mm
1,953
1840 mm
1,455
1395 mm
2,951
2730 mm
/
2 Doors
/
300 L
/
135 m
Fuel Economy
8.5
7 Km/L
66
66 L
/
7 Km/L
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
Transmission
9-speed automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
4.0 L
/
462 BHP - 585 BHP
/
Automatic
/
Petrol
/
TBD
/
2 Seater
/
Exterior
✓
/
Engine
V
V
4.0L
3.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Turbocharge
/
Twin-turbo
Single Turbo
639hp
312 BHP
470
/
900
377 Nm
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mercedes‑AMG GT 63 S 4MATIC+ 4‑Door
RC 350 F Sport Platinum 3.5L
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickRC 350 F Sport Platinum 3.5L
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mercedes‑AMG GT 63 S 4MATIC+ 4‑Door if you care more about fuel economy; choose RC 350 F Sport Platinum 3.5L if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mercedes‑AMG GT 63 S 4MATIC+ 4‑Door has a fuel consumption of 11.76, while RC 350 F Sport Platinum 3.5L has a fuel consumption of 14.29. Therefore, Mercedes‑AMG GT 63 S 4MATIC+ 4‑Door is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mercedes‑AMG GT 63 S 4MATIC+ 4‑Door has a wheelbase of 2,951, while RC 350 F Sport Platinum 3.5L has a wheelbase of 2730 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mercedes‑AMG GT 63 S 4MATIC+ 4‑Door, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mercedes‑AMG GT 63 S 4MATIC+ 4‑Door uses Four-Wheel Drive, while RC 350 F Sport Platinum 3.5L uses All Wheel Drive.