Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE vs MC20 3.0T V6 Comparison
Car Information
2.8
/
Engine / Motor
/
325 km/h
Dimensions
4
2 Seater
2390
/
5054.6
4669 mm
2070.1
1965 mm
1447.8
1221 mm
2951.48
2700 mm
/
150 L
Fuel Economy
12.3
8.6 Km/L
/
60 L
/
8.6 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Safety
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
AMG SPEEDSHIFT® MCT 9-speed
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
265/40R20
/
295/35R20
/
Key Spec
4.0 L
3.0 L
462 BHP - 585 BHP
630 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
2 Seater
2 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
V
/
4.0L
3.0 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
Turbocharge
/
Handcrafted AMG 4.0L V8 biturbo w/rear 150kW permanently synchronous electric motor
/
biturbo
/
831 hp
630 BHP
/
/
831 hp @ 5,500-6,500 rpm
/
1400
730 Nm
1400 Nm@ 2,500-4,500 rpm
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE
- Intelligent Emergency Call
MC20 3.0T V6
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMC20 3.0T V6
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE if you care more about fuel economy; choose MC20 3.0T V6 if you care more about power.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE has a fuel consumption of 8.13, while MC20 3.0T V6 has a fuel consumption of 11.63. Therefore, Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE has a wheelbase of 2951.48, while MC20 3.0T V6 has a wheelbase of 2700 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE uses Four-Wheel Drive, while MC20 3.0T V6 uses Rear Wheel Drive.